|
Have you ever seen a device or a program designed
to correct a dog behavior problem that explained how smart
dogs are and how they think?
Most plans or gadgets enable owners, literally, to declare
war on their hapless pets. Little or no concern is afforded
to what the dogs happen to think about them. In fact, the
implication is that dogs don't think at all ... either they
just react to external stimuli like robots , or respond according
to genetically controlled "drives."
Dogs are rarely credited with the ability to solve a problem
mentally; to analyze a situation; imagine ways to manipulate
or control it, then take a pre-planned course of action toward
a goal that was preconceived in the dog's mind. In short,
the dog is considered a real dummy, then treated like a dummy.
But this concept is not correct.
Dogs are smart. They can, and usually do, think rings around
their owners. And they can do it because most owners have
never learned how to think like a dog.
Understanding Non-Verbal
Thinking
We all wonder now and then what our dog is thinking. If we
wonder aloud, perhaps when mealtime is approaching and the
dog is looking expectantly at us, we might say something like,
"I'll bet Tippy's thinking, 'When is my dinner going
to be ready?' " In all likelihood, Tippy isn't originating
any thoughts about 'when dinner will be ready.' It is more
likely Tippy is imagining (or 'imaging' in his mind) the words
and movements you usually say and perform before getting his
dinner; something like, "You want dinner, Tippy?"
All that tail wagging and those pleading eyes are aimed at
stimulating you to say it.
But, an inability to originate thoughts in a spoken language
does not make dogs unintelligent. Even people don't actively
think in a spoken language unless they actively 'speak' it.
For instance, during a short vacation to Japan, if you don't
already speak the language, you'll probably pick up the meaning
of a few words. After a few natives look at you in the morning
and say "Ohio," you may eventually learn that they're
not curious about where you're from, but are wishing you a
"Good Morning." Still, you won't think in Japanese
unless you live there a few months and actively speak it.
Even a pet Akita will never learn to speak or think in the
native lingo because their voice boxes, tongues and lips cannot
formulate the sounds of Japanese ... or English, or French,
etc, etc. The limit of our dog's language-learning is the
meaning of the sounds of certain words. Luckily, dogs are
quick to learn the sounds that are important to them.
With this in mind, when Tippy is prodding us about serving
dinner, we'd be wise to discard ideas about complete sentences
being originated and thought about, and replace them with
the non-language concept of mental images. To illustrate this
further; when most Tippys are asking for dinner they actually
look from their owners toward the place where it is served,
generally the kitchen.
Evidence of Imagery
Some very convincing research suggests that dogs think in
sensory impressions; visual, sound and odor images, etc. This
is not to say that they sit around on quiet days experiencing
videos inside their brains. However, they likely share our
ability to form and experience in their minds certain images,
odors and sounds. The scientific basis for this idea came
from Russia and was published in the US in 1973. A scientist
name VS.. Rusinov1 was studying the electrophysiology of the
brain and had several dogs wired with brain wave equipment
and radio transmitters. When the dogs were brought into the
lab from the kennels for experimental conditioning tests,
the electroencephalograph machine was turned on to record
their brain wave patterns. This was done at the same time
each day, five days a week. One weekend, purely by accident,
Rusinov brought a group of visitors into the lab and turned
on the EEG machine. Lo, the dog that was normally schedule
for tests during the week at that time was sending wave forms
nearly identical to his regular working patterns! When the
testing time passed, the dogs' brain waves soon returned to
their normal 'at rest' forms. I never found any mention by
Rusinov as to whether the dogs out in the kennel were actually
performing their conditioned laboratory behaviorisms. Chances
are they were not, but one thing is almost sure; compared
to human experience in similar types of studies, the dogs
were apparently experiencing them mentally.
The late Polish scientist, Jerzi Konorski,3 taught dogs to
salivate and expect food in their trays when a light flickered.
This was done regularly every few minutes. However, after
a few trials, the dogs started salivating and looking at the
trays as if the food were actually there, even though the
light had not flickered. Konorski ventured that the dogs were
hallucinating about both the stimulus (the light) and the
reward for salivating (the food). One thing is sure: Something
was going on in the dogs' minds that made them behave as if
they were happening.
Some Human Examples
Before going on with dogs, let us consider some facets of
our own 'mind's eye,' as suggested by Konorski. Imagine we
have a date to meet a loved one at a busy restaurant. We get
there on time and sit at a table near the door. Fifteen minutes
go by, but no friend arrives. We begin to wonder if they are
coming at all. We start watching people approach the door.
Pretty soon, people with similar features almost cause us
to call out to them. The more concerned and anxious we become,
the more apt we are to mistake strangers for our friend. When
he or she finally arrives, the pleasure and relief we feel
is often mixed with mild displeasure. We are ambivalent ...
we have mixed emotions about meeting them in the future.
Almost everyone has mental imagery. Often, just the thought
of a loved one conjures up their image. This can apply to
sounds, as well. Think about your favorite musical piece and
your can often hear it in your 'mind's ear.' These are positive
images. They are emotionally pleasant. At the other end of
the scale, recalling a terrifying experience can not only
create its images, but sometime even make us shudder. This
is an example of negative, emotionally unpleasant images.
Back To Dogs
So it is with our dogs. When we are late getting home, or
if they over-miss us because we spoil them with attention
and petting every time they demand it, they very likely worry
in images, too. They may well recall images of us and our
activities, such as fluffing the pillows on the sofa, putting
away record albums, handling magazines and books, putting
on shoes just before leaving, sitting in a favorite armchair,
etc. As a result of this, they often engage in activities
which involve them with these images: Pillows wind up on the
floor, albums or magazines are moved or chewed, a chair seat
gets dug up, shoes are brought out of the closet. If they
can't have us there, they try to interact with things that
symbolize us.
If dogs really do store up and recall images of us and life's
other objects and experiences, it follows that we might use
this to our mutual benefit. But since most owners do not understand
how dogs think, this imagery is where the seeds of most behavior
problems are sown. Dogs receive and recall conflicting
images of owners and many important experiences.
The Puppy's Dilemma
Consider the new puppy whose owners come home at regular
times and join in an ecstatically joyful greeting ceremony.
This imagery is quickly ingrained, and the pup begins to anticipate
the experience, just Konorski's dogs hallucinated about the
flickering light and the food tray. However, as will happen
in even the most well regulated household, one day the owner
is late. The puppy begins experiencing the images of his tardy
owners ... starts fretting, pacing. Well primed energies,
ready for the greeting ceremony, demand an outlet as the adrenaline
starts pumping.
What's going on in its mind's eye or ear? It probably
imagines hearing footsteps, perhaps even sees the door open...
which doesn't happen. But it should. This introduces conflict
between what it wants and expects and what is really happening.
Conflict creates frustration. Frustration produces anxiety,
which triggers an even greater adrenaline rush. The pup searches
for something real to satisfy its desire to 'experience' the
owner ... a magazine or book it saw the owner reading recently.
It is rich with the owner's scent. If it cannot have the owner
there, it can at least have their genuine odor or taste. So
it sniffs, tastes, maybe even swallows parts of the article.
Naturally, this does not fully substitute for the whole owner,
so the puppy's social appetite is not really satisfied.
Finally, here comes the owner. The puppy innocently launches
into its joyous, semi-hysterical ritual. The owner starts
to join in, but spies the pulverized magazine or book. What's
this? Naturally, if not wisely, the owner angrily grabs the
pup, drags it to the demolished object and scolds it, or slaps
it's snout or rump, or both. The pet's single-track mind is
riveted on the owner. It yips, rolls over, or struggles vainly
to escape. Punishment concluded, the owner angrily
picks up the remnants of the article and storms to the trash
basket.
Psychic Trauma
The net result of this is a totally confused pup with a
conflicting set of images of its owner. This sort of shock
to the nervous system is called psychic trauma in both animals
and humans. A conflict has been instilled between the positive
image of the owner (happy Dr. Jekyll) and the negative (Mr.
Homecoming Hyde). This creates frustration and anxiety about
homecomings, growing in severity if the scenario is repeated
a few times. (It is interesting that in many cases, owners
tell us that the pup was fine for a day or so after the first
punishment. This may equate to the human experience of repression,
in which memory of the traumatic experience is suppressed,
creating a sort of 'backwards amnesia.') Even when this occurs,
since the punishment was not associated with the act of chewing
up something, the puppy seeks out another article, perhaps
a shoe, and the cycle is repeated until the total relationship
between owner and dog is tainted with emotional ambivalence.
Mixed feelings are eating away at the positive qualities of
their relationship. Negative emotional impressions may start
to dominate it.
At about this stage, many owners conclude that the punishment
may not have been severe enough. That's why the correction
was not permanent. So they intensify it. The relationship
erodes further as weeks go by. Enough of this cascading negative
effect and the owner is ready take drastic action. The dog,
now hyper-sensitive to its owner's mood change, feels something
is wrong. This often is reflected by new problems, such as
submissive wetting when the owner comes home or approaches
the dog at other times; off-schedule bowel movements or urination
occur, etc.
Many pets act insecure, currying more favor when the owner
is home, and hence, missing the owner even more acutely when
left alone. Frustration and anxiety build, while the isolation-related,
tension-relieving behavior mounts. The unwitting owner, who
originally may have thought the dog is 'getting even' for
being left alone, begins to consider it incorrigible.
HELP!
This is when outside help is often sought. A book is purchased.
The veterinarian, breeder, pet shop, a trainer or behaviorist
may be consulted. If lucky, the owner gets advice that brings
genuine insight into pet/owner relationships and dog behavior.
But, more likely, they find traditional quick fixes and the
dog winds up in a desensitization program; gets dosed with
anxiety relieving drugs or barbiturates; is stuck in a cramped
crate or cage all day, or banned to the yard or garage, or
has its mouth stuffed with chewed debris and taped shut for
hours. Since none of these approaches deal with the causes,
the 'thinking dog' and the total relationship with its owners
and the environment, success is rare. The majority of these
formerly precious pets find themselves rejected ... relegated
to the local pound for five to seven days, where the odds
are 3-to-2 they'll suffer society's 'ultimate solution'. But
things don't have to be so grim, if the owners learn some
'dog think.'
Applying Positive Imagery To Solve 'Separation Anxiety'
Dogs that misbehave when they are left alone are said to be
suffering from separation anxiety. The term is a neat buzz-phrase;
almost everybody uses it. It sounds professional. The trouble
is, as a transplant from human psychiatry, it really doesn't
convey much useful information. However, the term is here,
so we'll use it in its broadest sense, which is; "a troubled
feeling when left alone or apart from a certain person or
persons." This allows us to recommend a remedial behavioral
program that deals with the realities of the dog's total relationships.
First, however, we must be sure that the dog's veterinarian
has ruled out the many physical/medical causes for anxiety,
such as thyrotoxicosis, hyperthyroidism, pre-diabetes, encephalitis,
allergies, hyperkinesis, etc. etc.
The Program
Dogs that are unduly upset when left alone usually enjoy their
owner's attention and petting whenever they ask for (or demand
it) when the people are at home. To apply the imagery concept
to this relationship, we could say the dog 'sees itself' as
directing, or leading the owner.
When it wants some petting, it nudges or otherwise stimulates
the owner, and the owner complies. The dog wants out, whines
at the door or at the owner, and the door gets opened. Mealtime
approaches, dog whines and prances, and dinner gets served.
When the owner goes from room to room, the dog is either ahead,
leading them, or close behind. This is the reality of their
relationship, at least in the dog's mind. But, when the owner
leaves, against the dog's wishes, the pet is predictably upset,
and problem behavior occurs. This can involve barking, chewing,
pacing, self-mutilation, off-schedule bowel movements, urination
around the house, etc.
The leadership problem can be turned about by presenting
a different reality to the dog; one in which the dog is pleasantly,
but firmly and consistently told to perform some simple act,
such as 'sit' whenever it attempts to gain attention or affection,
or whenever the owner wants to give the dog some attention.
All 'sits', or whatever command is used ('down' is a good
one for highly bossy dogs) are praised happily as 3 to 5 seconds
of petting is awarded; then the dog is cheerfully released
with an "OK" or "Free." (Free is a good
release because OK is too common a word.)
If a really bossy dog refuses to obey, and many do when they
realize their relationship is being turned around, simply
ignore the situation, turn away and go on about some other
activity, ignoring the dog. Some dogs have refused to respond
for as long as four days before coming to terms with a follower
relationship. However long it takes, after a few days the
dog's image of itself seems to evolve from one of giving direction
to taking it with compliance prior to being petted, getting
dinner, going out the door, getting on the couch, etc.
In moving around the house, whenever the dog forges ahead,
simply about-turn and go the other way. This must be repeated
until the dog walks patiently behind or, better yet, doesn't
even follow. It is also helpful, but not vital, to practice
down-stays of increasing length during several evenings a
week.
Images of Hyper-Emotionality
Most 'home alone' problem dogs get extremely emotional when
their owners get home; some even get excitable when regular
departure times approach. To supplant these emotionally over-stimulating
images, sit quietly for about five minutes before leaving,
in the area where the dog will be left. No eye contact or
speaking is allowed. Then, get up and go without looking at
or speaking to the pet.
At homecoming, enter quietly and ignore the dog until it
quiets down completely. Then it is greeted happily, but briefly,
away from the door of arrival. This subdued routine soon replaces
the dog's highly emotional mental images of returns and departures
with calmness and serenity.
Here's the tough part for most all dog owners: When coming
home the place is a mess! Pillows have been chewed, or the
chair is tattered again, or a pile of poop graces the doorway,
or some other problem is evident. If we keep in mind that
the dog has in the past suffered from conflicting images at
homecoming, it is imperative that no emotion, or even attention,
should be directed at the remnants of the problem; such as
chewed up magazines, shoes, defecation, etc. Instead, after
five minutes of ignoring the dog, it should be greeted away
from the scene of the misbehavior, and then pleasantly taken
outdoors or to another room and left alone while the mess
is cleaned up. This avoids creating new (or reinforcing old)
conflicting images of emotional reactions to, or interactions
with, the debris, defecation, etc.
I have always called this 'the secret clean-up'. It has worked
wonders as part of programs ranging from digging in the yard
to housetraining puppies. Just why it is such an effective
adjunct to correction programs remains to be satisfactorily
explained. In the meantime, we'll have to say that the lack
of an image of the owner and the mess is more beneficial to
correction than is the image.
The Big Picture
So, there it is. Dogs think in images and we can mold and
change their behavior in hundreds of ways if we will think
as they do. For instance, on the negative side, a set
up whereby a car screeches to a stop, horn blaring, just as
a dog starts toward the street from the sidewalk, then praising
its retreat, is a valuable exercise in negative imagery. However,
it must be repeated until the dog avoids the street when cars
are not present, as well.
Teaching the 'panic' command to come needs the dog's name
followed by a code word, a sound image that is exclusive to
coming when it is absolutely necessary, and praise words or
a vocal rhythm that is unique to that command, coupled with
fast hand-clapping while taking a crouched position. These
combined, positive images can create a dog that will dependably
respond to your code word and come to your praise. It is especially
important to teach this command when the dog is out of sight,
as well.
|