| By now
today's breeders have heard about genetic testing,
and DNA, but what is really involved in finding
a mutation, and what do the results of the test
mean?
What is a gene?
DNA (deoxyribonucleic acid) is a large molecule
comprised of four basic units linked together
in a long strand. If we assign each unit a letter,
then we can envision the chromosome as a long
string of letters. Genes can be thought of as
long words scattered along the chromosome. These
words have special meaning to the worker molecules
in the cell, and encode a set of instructions
as to what they are to build. Any mistake in a
word scrambles the instructions, and either the
workers in the cell make no product or a defective
one is made. These mistakes in genes are known
as mutations.
There are basically two kinds of mutations, dominant
and recessive. Every cell in the body (except
sperm and eggs) has two copies of each gene (one
from the sire, and one from the dam). A dominant
mutation is where one defective copy of a gene
is enough to affect the individual, whereas a
recessive mutation requires that both copies of
the gene carry a mutation for the individual to
be affected.
How do scientists go about finding a mutation?
At the present time, there are two ways to identify
mutations that cause genetic diseases. The first
way is to find canine "homologs" of
genes that cause a similar diseases in another
species, such as mouse, rat or human. Genes involved
in fundamental biological processes show a large
degree of similarity between species. Scientists
can take advantage of this conservation to "clone"
(isolate) canine genes that may carry similar
defects. Inbred strains of mice provide a wealth
of information as to where to look in dogs. Likewise
the human genome project, whose goal is the unlock
the order of each letter along every chromosome,
will also be invaluable in canine genetic research.
Both the wild type and the suspected mutant genes
need to be cloned and compared. In the case of
PRA in Irish Setters, the culprit gene (rd1) was
first identified in mice that had PRA. The defective
"letter" in the mouse gene was not the
same as in the Irish Setter, but it was the same
gene, and the result was PRA in both species.
Direct tests
In the case of a discovery of an exact mutation,
the diagnosis is accurate. For genes with one
letter changes there is a simple way determine
the presence of mutations by using diagnostic
enzymes (called restrictions enzymes) that recognize
a string of letters representing the region around
the mutation, and the wild type sequence at the
site of the mutation
The portion of the gene surrounding a mutation
can be synthesized readily in the laboratory by
a process called PCR (polymerase chain reaction).
This method allow specific regions of the genome
to be amplified from a small sample, and the DNA
can be analyzed quickly. DNA samples for individuals
can be obtained from any cells. They are most
easily obtained by scrapping a few cells from
the inner cheek with a small brush. All the ingredients
required to make more DNA are put in a test tube
and the DNA is made in a PCR machine. The key
is the addition of a string of letters that corresponds
to your gene to "prime" the synthesis.
Next, the amplified DNA is purified, and then
cut with restriction enzymes. Two enzymes should
be used for diagnosis, one for the wild type sequence,
and one for the mutant sequence.
In this diagnosis, if you cut a wild type chromosome
with an enzyme that recognizes the wild-type sequence,
you get two pieces of DNA from the original one.
They can be separated according to size on a gel
matrix, and observed under ultraviolet light.
If the animal is free of the mutation you will
see only two pieces of DNA. If however, one of
the chromosomes carries a mutation, you will see
three fragments of DNA, the two from the wild-type
chromosome, and a third, larger piece that was
not cut by the enzyme. In the example shown here,
the left lane contains uncut DNA, while the middle
and right lanes have been cut with an enzyme that
recognizes the wild-type sequence. The middle
lane shows the two bands expected from a dog that
is clear, while the right lane shows that dog
to be a carrier (3 bands). An affected dog would
give only a single band.
The diagnosis should then be repeated with the
enzyme that recognizes the mutation. This is essential
because digestion with the wild type enzyme can
be incomplete, and false products can occasionally
be synthesized. Both of these possibilities must
be ruled out. If either of these two things occur,
the animal should be retested. I would also recommend
that if a carrier is identified in a series of
animals tested, that he/she be retested, in the
unlikely event that samples were mixed up in the
laboratory. A carefully designed experiment should
also include a negative control to make sure that
none of the reagents used in the laboratory are
contaminated with product.
Other defects may involve deletions of one letter
or more in the gene. Diagnosis in this case would
involve PCR amplification and the identification
of the differently sized products. Digestion of
these products with restriction enzymes which
should give a predicted size pattern of DNA fragments.
Additional fragments would be observed in carriers.
Linkage tests
The second, and less accurate way to identify
mutations is known as linkage. Scattered throughout
the chromosomes there exists short repeated groups
of letters known as microsatellites (for example
CACACACACACA). These can vary in length of repeat
from individual to individual and are therefore
referred to as simple sequence length polymorphisms
(SSLP). Hundreds of these sequences have been
isolated for the canine genome as tools for mapping
genes. Because SSLPs can vary in length between
individuals, they can be used to track defective
genes. In order to find a microsatellite locus
that is "linked" to a trait, you need
a "family" of dogs in a pedigree. The
disease status of dogs within this pedigree is
made by some biochemical means or by physical
examination depending on the defect. For example
in the case of copper toxicosis in Bedlington
terriers, the animals were determined as affected
or unaffected by a liver biopsy, and a quantitative
copper assay (Yuzbasiyan-Gurkan, et al., AJVM,
58:23-27, 1997). Knowing the status of the dogs
then allows scientist to look for a microsatellite
locus that is "linked" to the presence
of disease. Hundreds of markers must be examined
before a linkage with disease to a microsatellite
is found.
A linked microsatellite is said to co-segregate
with the gene. The closer that the marker is linked
to the disease, the more accurate the test. This
needs to be reproduced with a goodly number of
family members. Thus to find a gene with this
method is relatively labor intensive.
Here is how the products of a PCR amplification
of an SSLP closely linked to a gene for some genetic
disease would look like when separated on a gel
matrix.
| Affected |
Non-affected |
Carrier |
______
|
______ |
_______
_______ |
In an affected animal, both copies of the microsatellite
(one from each chromosome) are the same (they
happen to be longer in this example) and both
form the non-affected individuals are shorter.
You must establish a correlation between the larger
or smaller version of the microsatellite and the
non-affected individual. In another family, the
smaller version might be found in the affected
animals because chromosomes can recombine, and
the long microsatellite sequence may have crossed
over to the chromosome carrying the wild type.
Because of this, the genotype of animals cannot
be determined with absolute certainty. Accuracy
is generally about 95-99%.
Performing this test is then trivial. It involves
isolating DNA from an animal, synthesis of DNA
using "primers" to a given microsatellite
locus, and separating the products through a gel
matrix. Because contamination is an ever-present
risk, negative controls need to be included in
the diagnostic experiment.
Because the isolation of a linked microsatellite
identifies a specific region of the genome, it
narrows down where to look for a specific gene
causing a disease, and thus could ultimately lead
to a specific test.
What the future holds
The area of genetic testing in dogs is so active
that the prediction is that within a decade that
there will be genetic tests for most of the genetic
diseases in dogs. As well, one can envision tests
for behavioral traits. One important note to breeders
is that information must be used carefully, to
make proper decisions for breeding in order to
maintain genetic diversity in the breed. In the
case of recessive disorders, if a carrier is bred
to a clear, none of the puppies will be affected;
however there is a 50% chance that individuals
will be carriers. Likewise, there is a 50% chance
that the puppies will be normal.
Litters that are DNA-tested can be used to gradually
eliminate the problem from the breed, without
disturbing the gene pool.
|