| |
Hello. On this page is a set of
"typical" genetics questions that are
best answered using a punnett square. It would be
handy for you to have a pencil & some paper
to work out the problems, & then you can click
to see an explained solution to each.
For those who would benefit from a step-by-step
explaination of how to use a p-square, click the
link below to my "Baby Steps through the Punnet
Square" page. As always, do your
best!
|
| |
| P-squARe
prActICE QueSTioN #1 |
| Let's say that in seals, the
gene for the length of the whiskers has two alleles.
The dominant allele (W) codes long whiskers &
the recessive allele (w) codes for short whiskers.
a) What percentage of offspring would
be expected to have short whiskers from the
cross of two long-whiskered seals, one that
is homozygous dominant and one that is heterozygous?
b) If one parent seal is pure long-whiskered
and the other is short-whiskered, what percent
of offspring would have short whiskers?
|
| sOLUTioN
TO QueSTioN 1 |
| (Work
it out 1st !) |
| |
| P-sqARE
PraCTice qUesTiON #2 |
| |
| In purple people eaters, one-horn
is dominant and no horns is recessive. Draw a Punnet
Square showing the cross of a purple people eater
that is hybrid for horns with a purple people eater
that does not have horns. Summarize the genotypes
& phenotypes of the possible offspring. |
| SOlutiON
TO qUeStion 2 |
| (Work
it out 1st !) |
| |
| p-sqUaRe
pRAcTicE QUestiON #3 |
| |
| A green-leafed luboplant (I made
this plant up) is crossed with a luboplant with
yellow-striped leaves. The cross produces 185 green-leafed
luboplants. Summarize the genotypes & phenotypes
of the offspring that would be produced by crossing
two of the green-leafed luboplants obtained from
the initial parent plants. |
| sOlUTion
tO queStIoN 3 |
| (Work
it out 1st !) |
| |
| P-squARE
PRacTice qUeStION #4 |
| Mendel found that crossing wrinkle-seeded
plants with pure round-seeded plants produced only
round-seeded plants. What genotypic & phenotypic
ratios can be expected from a cross of a wrinkle-seeded
plant & a plant heterozygous for this trait
(seed appearance)? |
| soLutION
to QueStiON 4 |
| (Work
it out 1st !) |
| |
NOTES:
There are only so many possible crosses that you
could be asked about. They are: |
| PARENT GENOTYPES |
OFFSPRING PHENOTYPES |
| pure (homozygous) dominant x
anything |
100% of offspring with dominant
trait |
| hybrid x homozygous recessive |
50% dominant trait, 50% recessive
trait |
| hybrid x hybrid |
75% with dominant trait &
25% with recessive trait |
| homozygous recessive x homozygous
recessive |
100% recessive trait |
|
Seem like too much to memorize? Maybe it is.
But the thing is if you can use the Punnett
Square, you can work out ANY problem & get
reliable results, so memorizing that chart ISN"T
necessary
|
- Understanding the vocabulary in the questions
is extremely important. I've noticed that once
students get the square set up they do just
fine, it's that interpretation of the words
in the question that they find most challenging.
So LEARN THE VOCAB (pure/homozygous, hybrid/heterozygous,
genotype, phenotype, cross, etc.).
- The questions on this page are about as basic
as they come. None of them involved any "advanced"
genetic concepts like incomplete dominance,
codominance, sex-linkage, or multiple alleles,
we will practice those on another page. OK?
|
| Solutions |
| |
| P-squARe
prActICE QueSTioN #1 - SOLUTION |
In seals, the gene for the length of the whiskers
has two alleles. The dominant allele (W) codes long
whiskers & the recessive allele (w) codes for
short whiskers.
a) What percentage of offspring would be expected
to have short whiskers from the cross of two long-whiskered
seals, one that is homozygous dominant and one
that is heterozygous? ANSWER: 0%. |
I personally like to write down the
info given in the question on my paper first. So
I start by writing:
W = allele for long whiskers
w = allele for short whiskers
A homozygous dominant seal would be "WW"
(homozygous dominant = 2 CAPITAL letters).
A heterozygous seal would be "Ww" (heterozygous
= 1 CAPITAL & 1 lowercase).
The cross is in the question therefore: WW x Ww.
The P-Square would look like this:
|
The
possible gametes from the homozygous parent seal
are on the left in front of the rows, & the
possible gametes from the heterozygous parent are
above the columns. We fill in the boxes by copying
"one letter from the left, one letter from
the top".
Analyzing our results, we find that 50% of our
offspring (2 of 4 boxes) are "WW", and
50% (2 of 4 boxes) are "Ww". In terms
of phenotype (what they would look like) 100%
would have long whiskers (because all of the offspring
have at least one "W", which codes for
long whiskers).
So the answer to question 1a is: 0% would
have short whiskers. The only way to have
short whiskers is to be "ww", and that
combo is not possible from the parents in this
cross. |
| |
| b) If one parent seal is pure long-whiskered
and the other is short-whiskered, what percent of
offspring would have short whiskers? ANSWER:
0%. |
Again, I suggest starting by defining
symbols like so:
W = allele for long whiskers
w = allele for short whiskers "Pure"
is the same as homozygous, so "pure long-whiskered"
would be "WW".
If you're a seal, the only way to have short whiskers
is to have the homozygous recessive genotype, in
other words be "ww".
So our cross is: WW x ww. |
| The trusty p-square would be: |

The alleles from the long-whiskered parent (WW)
are out in front of the rows (at the left), &
the alleles of the short-whiskered parent are above
the columns. By the way, we could switch that around
& it would not change our answer at all. What
I'm saying is: it doesn't matter where you put the
parents (top or side).
Anyway, all our offspring (4 of 4 boxes) have the
same genotype: "Ww" & would all end
up with long whiskers. To summarize the offspring:
genotype = 100% heterozygous (Ww)
phenotype = 100% long-whiskered.
So our answer to Question 1b is also: 0%
would be short-whiskered.
|
TIP:
In any cross involving at least one parent that
is homozygous dominant (2 CAPITAL letters),
100% of the offspring will have the dominant trait
in their phenotype.
This is illustrated by Questions 1a & 1b. |
| BACK
TO QUESTION 1 |
| |
|
P-sqARE PraCTice qUesTiON #2 - SOLUTION |
| |
| In purple people eaters, one-horn
is dominant and no horns is recessive. Draw a Punnet
Square showing the cross of a purple people eater
that is hybrid for horns with a purple people eater
that does not have horns. Summarize the genotypes
& phenotypes of the possible offspring. |
| |
ANSWER:
|
| Genotypes of Offspring |
Phenotype(s) of Offspring |
50% hybrid (Hh)
50% homozygous recessive (hh) |
50% one-horn
50% no horns |
|
No specific letter is given in the
question to use as an abbreviation, so it's UP TO
YOU! Being a real rebel, I'll use this:
H = dominant allele for one horn
h = recessive allele for no (zero) horns
A purple people eater that is "hybrid"
has one of each letters (the definition of hybrid),
so that parent is "Hh". A purple people
eater without horns has the recessive phenotype
and the only way to have a recessive phenotype
is to have a homozygous recessive genotype, which
is 2 lowercase letters, "hh".
So our cross for this question is: Hh x hh.
|
| The p-square should be: |
Alright,
there we have it. The alleles carried in the sex
cells of the purple people eaters are split up &
placed "outside" the p-square. The alleles
from the one-horn eater are on the left, and the
alleles of the eater without horns are above each
column. Copy one letter from the left & one
from the top to fill-in the boxes. The combinations
inside the boxses are the possible genotypes (with
respect to horns) of purple people eater offspring
from these two parent purple people eaters.
Analyzing the data is simple count how many of each
genotype & phenotype are found in each of the
four boxes. So, here we have 2 of 4 boxes "Hh"
(50% hybrid, one horn), and 2 of 4 boxes "hh"
(homozygous recessive, no horns).
Is you confidence soaring? |
| BACK
TO QUESTION 2 |
| |
| p-sqUaRe
pRAcTicE QUestiON #3 - SOLUTION |
| |
A green-leafed luboplant
(I made this plant up) is crossed with a luboplant
with yellow-striped leaves. The cross produces 185
green-leafed luboplants. Summarize the genotypes
& phenotype of the offspring that would be produced
by crossing two of the green-leafed luboplants obtained
from the initial parent plants. |
| ANSWER: |
| Genotypes of the F2 Offspring |
Phenotype(s) of F2 Offspring |
25% homozygous dominant (GG)
50% hybrid (Gg)
25% homozygous recessive (gg) |
75% green-leafed
25% yellow-striped leaves |
|
OK, first let's jot down some letters
& what they stand for. Since the parent luboplants
have different leaf colors and 100% of the offspring
resemble only one parent (i.e. they are all green),
green is the dominant trait. It makes sense then
to use:
G = dominant allele for green leaves
g = recesssive allele for yellow-striped leaves
|
TIP: This is important
to recognize
When two parents have opposite traits, and
all their offspring look like only one of
the parents, the trait the offspring have
is the DOMINANT TRAIT |
|
The 185 "F1" offspring
are all hybrids. How do I know? Lots of practice.
The yellow-striped parent MUST BE "gg".
The 185 offspring had to have inherited a "g"
from that parent plant because that parent plant
has no "G's" to pass on. Since the 185
offspring are ALL green, they must have a dominant
allele for green ("G"), so their entire
genotype is "Gg".
Don't believe me? That first cross must have been
GG x gg, & its p-square would look like this:
|

Notice that 100% are hybrid (Gg) and 100% would
look green. IF that green parent had "Gg"
for a genotype, then we would get half of the offspring
with a homozygous recessive genotype (gg), which
would give us 50% yellow-striped luboplants. THIS
IS NOT WHAT HAPPENED. The questions clearly states
that all fo the 185 plants are green, pretty good
evidence that green-leafed parent luboplant is "GG"
& not "Gg".
The offspring of this cross, by the way, are refferred
to as the "first filial" or "F1"
generation. |
Now, our question has to do with
crossing two memebers of this F1 generation. That
cross would be: Gg x Gg.
The punnett square showing this cross of two hybrids
is: |
| Genotypes of the F2 Offspring |
Phenotype(s) of F2 Offspring |
1 of 4 boxes (25%) homozygous
dominant (GG)
2 of 4 boxes (50%) hybrid (Gg)
1 of 4 boxes (25%) homozygous recessive (gg) |
3 of 4 boxes (75%) green-leafed
1 of 4 boxes (25%) yellow-striped leaves |
|
| BACK
TO QUESTION 3 |
| |
| P-squARE
PRacTice qUeStION #4 - SOLUTION |
| |
| Mendel found that crossing wrinkle-seeded
plants with pure round-seeded plants produced only
round-seeded plants. What genotypic & phenotypic
ratios can be expected from a cross of a wrinkle-seeded
plant & a plant heterozygous for this trait?
|
| |
| ANSWER: 50% HYBRID ROUND-SEEDED,
& 50% HOMOZYGOUS RECESSIVE WRINKLE-SEEDED |
| |
The first thing to figure out is
which trait is dominant & which is recessive.
We get this from the 1st sentence. If a wrinkled
x round cross produces all round, then round is
dominant & wrinkled is recessive.
Define our symbols:
R = dominant allele for round seeds
r = recessive allele for wrinkled seeds
Our wrinkle-seeded parent MUST be "rr",
because the only way for a recessive trait to
show up is if the genotype is homozygous recessive,
which is 2 lowercase letters (rr). Our parent
that is "heterozygous for this trait"
is "Rr", because heterozygous = hybrid=
1 CAPITAL & 1 lowercase.
So our cross for this problem is: rr x Rr.
|

Again, you may have your "r's" on top
& the "R" & "r" on the
left, the combos inside the p-square will end up
the same. No problem. Remember, "one from the
left & one from the top" when you are filling
in the boxes. Of the offspring in this cross, 2
of 4 (50%) are hybrid (Rr) and would have round
seeds, and 2 of 4 (50%) are homozygous recessive
(rr) and would have wrinkled seeds.
Good work. |
| BACK
TO QUESTION 4 |
| |